In our comparison of Altair vs. Board, Altair is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
Flexible set up, customized reports in BOARd and Excel, the smaller size of vendors, integration with SAP, CRM MS Dynamics and Cognos TM1, strong database structure.
Rarely crashes occur due to Excel Add-ins. Datamart is needed to purchase it as a BI tool.
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
A user-friendly tool for everyone.
Flexibility is linked with the structure created in implementation at the start.
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
Flexible set up, customized reports in BOARd and Excel, the smaller size of vendors, integration with SAP, CRM MS Dynamics and Cognos TM1, strong database structure.
Rarely crashes occur due to Excel Add-ins. Datamart is needed to purchase it as a BI tool.
A user-friendly tool for everyone.
Flexibility is linked with the structure created in implementation at the start.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Altair vs. Board, Board has 42 user reviews and Altair has 1. The average star rating for Board is 4.40 while Altair has an average rating of 4. Board has more positive reviews than Altair. Comparing Altair vs. Board reviews, Board has stronger overall reviews.
Altair vs. Board both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Altair vs. Board, Altair offers more of the most popular features and tools than Board.
In our pricing comparison of Altair vs. Board, Board's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Board's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Altair vs. Board shows that Board scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Altair scores higher in meets requirements, but Board has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
