In our comparison of Manhattan Active vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Routing orders for Wasserstrom is rather simple to use.
Subpar client service-delayed responses.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
Routing orders for Wasserstrom is rather simple to use.
Subpar client service-delayed responses.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Routing orders for Wasserstrom is rather simple to use.
Subpar client service-delayed responses.
Routing orders for Wasserstrom is rather simple to use.
Subpar client service-delayed responses.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Manhattan Active vs. SAP S/4HANA, Manhattan Active has 2 user reviews and SAP S/4HANA has 98. The average star rating for Manhattan Active is 4.5 while SAP S/4HANA has an average rating of 4.27. Manhattan Active has more positive reviews than SAP S/4HANA. Comparing Manhattan Active vs. SAP S/4HANA reviews, Manhattan Active has stronger overall reviews.
Manhattan Active vs. SAP S/4HANA both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Customer Management, Accounting Features, Employee Management, Lead Management, Event Management, Asset Management, Campaign Management, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Reporting & Analytics, Shipping & Logistics Management, Workforce Optimization, Payroll Management, Project Management Features, Workflow Automation, Expense Management, Resource Management, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Conferencing Capabilities, Portal Types, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies, Campaign Types, Chat/IM Management, Route Management. In our feature comparison of Manhattan Active vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA offers more of the most popular features and tools than Manhattan Active.
In our pricing comparison of Manhattan Active vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to SAP S/4HANA's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Manhattan Active vs. SAP S/4HANA shows that SAP S/4HANA scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. Manhattan Active scores higher in ease of admin, but SAP S/4HANA has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
