In our comparison of Practice Fusion vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
We moved to a disparate software set as there were multiple extraneous features not applicable to our practice while we searched for software to store printable SOAP charts and digital medical records for our medical massage therapy patients.
Reading the interface is simple, navigating landing pages is easy, getting via menus is simple, and colors pop.
For our practice, it was inappropriate or helpful.
Clinicals has significantly improved our ability to navigate patient charts and doctor's notes, simplifying our daily tasks and enhancing patient communication.
Streamlining the management of patient charts and information, offering a stress-free and efficient platform for communication with patients.
None
At the beginning is only when I managed to contact client service. I never managed to get aid setting up my e-prescribing after signing the year contract. When paying for the monthly fee, I wasn’t able to use it for the whole year.
Signing the contract was eased and made friendly as it’s among the cheaper solutions.
Client support is terrible, setting up and using e-prescribe is not possible, client service were unreachable after cancellation (upon dislike) of the prescription during the first year which is under contract.
For medical practices with licensed MDs, LCSWs, LMHCs, LCACs, and LMFTs, Athena is a game-changer. Its efficiency in managing diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments makes it a top recommendation, especially for practices that incorporate behavioral health and mental health services.
User-friendly system, ensuring a seamless transition to the next steps in our medical practice. The layout is intuitive, making it easy to access crucial information such as diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments.
Inability to integrate with our non-licensed practitioners.
We moved to a disparate software set as there were multiple extraneous features not applicable to our practice while we searched for software to store printable SOAP charts and digital medical records for our medical massage therapy patients.
Reading the interface is simple, navigating landing pages is easy, getting via menus is simple, and colors pop.
For our practice, it was inappropriate or helpful.
At the beginning is only when I managed to contact client service. I never managed to get aid setting up my e-prescribing after signing the year contract. When paying for the monthly fee, I wasn’t able to use it for the whole year.
Signing the contract was eased and made friendly as it’s among the cheaper solutions.
Client support is terrible, setting up and using e-prescribe is not possible, client service were unreachable after cancellation (upon dislike) of the prescription during the first year which is under contract.
Clinicals has significantly improved our ability to navigate patient charts and doctor's notes, simplifying our daily tasks and enhancing patient communication.
Streamlining the management of patient charts and information, offering a stress-free and efficient platform for communication with patients.
None
For medical practices with licensed MDs, LCSWs, LMHCs, LCACs, and LMFTs, Athena is a game-changer. Its efficiency in managing diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments makes it a top recommendation, especially for practices that incorporate behavioral health and mental health services.
User-friendly system, ensuring a seamless transition to the next steps in our medical practice. The layout is intuitive, making it easy to access crucial information such as diagnoses, allergies, medications, and appointments.
Inability to integrate with our non-licensed practitioners.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Practice Fusion vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals has 8 user reviews and Practice Fusion has 27. The average star rating for athenaClinicals is 4.25 while Practice Fusion has an average rating of 3.59. athenaClinicals has more positive reviews than Practice Fusion. Comparing Practice Fusion vs. athenaClinicals reviews, athenaClinicals has stronger overall reviews.
Practice Fusion vs. athenaClinicals both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Document Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Practice Fusion vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals offers more of the most popular features and tools than Practice Fusion.
In our pricing comparison of Practice Fusion vs. athenaClinicals, athenaClinicals's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to athenaClinicals's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Practice Fusion vs. athenaClinicals shows that athenaClinicals scores higher in usability for learning curve. Practice Fusion scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but athenaClinicals has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
