In our comparison of OneLogin vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
OneLogin has undoubtedly enhanced our organization's security posture, but there are moments when the tradeoff between security and convenience can feel like a bit of a hurdle to overcome.
Ability to streamline access to a suite of internal tools. The integration with Slack is impressive.
Reminder to always remember your password, as there's little room for shortcuts.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
We use OneLogin as a portal to many of our different company platforms.
OneLogin is very convenient as we can avoid logging into many programs while working. Its the dashboard is so designed that you can see all the accounts that you use. But you can also view the accounts of the entire company.
The mobile app is disappointing. It is difficult to switch between tasks. Even though the OneLogin app is for the mobile, it will not take the user to a mobile-friendly version of the program.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
OneLogin has undoubtedly enhanced our organization's security posture, but there are moments when the tradeoff between security and convenience can feel like a bit of a hurdle to overcome.
Ability to streamline access to a suite of internal tools. The integration with Slack is impressive.
Reminder to always remember your password, as there's little room for shortcuts.
We use OneLogin as a portal to many of our different company platforms.
OneLogin is very convenient as we can avoid logging into many programs while working. Its the dashboard is so designed that you can see all the accounts that you use. But you can also view the accounts of the entire company.
The mobile app is disappointing. It is difficult to switch between tasks. Even though the OneLogin app is for the mobile, it will not take the user to a mobile-friendly version of the program.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of OneLogin vs. ThreatConnect, OneLogin has 32 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for OneLogin is 4.59 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. OneLogin has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing OneLogin vs. ThreatConnect reviews, OneLogin has stronger overall reviews.
OneLogin vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of OneLogin vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than OneLogin.
In our pricing comparison of OneLogin vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of OneLogin vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. OneLogin scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
