In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Trellix, Trellix is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Trellix, Trellix has 28 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Trellix is 4.32 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Trellix has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. Trellix reviews, Trellix has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. Trellix both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Data Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Sync/Refresh, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Trellix, Trellix offers more of the most popular features and tools than QRadar SIEM.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Trellix, Trellix's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Trellix's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Trellix shows that Trellix scores higher in usability for meets requirements, quality of support. QRadar SIEM scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin, but Trellix has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
