In our comparison of Bullhorn vs. Workable, Workable is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
As the person who operates this system in our organization, I love how it is very flexible in all cases, the ability to edit and customize data easily, creating new fields, customize reports and creating custom dashboard has been a great help. The support team has also been a great help when I have some issues. Great software for everyone.
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
One of the best things about Bullhorn is that it has an integrated email system, which makes it easier for me to email my co-workers and candidates. I also like that it gives me the ability to add more information about our prospects into the system quickly.
Bullhorn is clunky and not that easy to use. Some of its features are also not intuitive as well.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
As the person who operates this system in our organization, I love how it is very flexible in all cases, the ability to edit and customize data easily, creating new fields, customize reports and creating custom dashboard has been a great help. The support team has also been a great help when I have some issues. Great software for everyone.
One of the best things about Bullhorn is that it has an integrated email system, which makes it easier for me to email my co-workers and candidates. I also like that it gives me the ability to add more information about our prospects into the system quickly.
Bullhorn is clunky and not that easy to use. Some of its features are also not intuitive as well.
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Bullhorn vs. Workable, Workable has 81 user reviews and Bullhorn has 67. The average star rating for Workable is 4.45 while Bullhorn has an average rating of 4.10. Workable has more positive reviews than Bullhorn. Comparing Bullhorn vs. Workable reviews, Workable has stronger overall reviews.
Bullhorn vs. Workable both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Human Resources (HR) Features, Talent Management , Attendance Management, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Tax Forms, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Document Management, Signature Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Workflow Automation, Data Migration, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Language & Speech. In our feature comparison of Bullhorn vs. Workable, Workable offers more of the most popular features and tools than Bullhorn.
In our pricing comparison of Bullhorn vs. Workable, Workable's pricing starts at $149/month and is more affordable compared to Workable's starting cost of $149/month.
Our comparison of Bullhorn vs. Workable shows that Bullhorn scores higher in usability for ease of use. Workable scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Bullhorn has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
