In our comparison of Arkadin vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, HighFive Video Conferencing is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Its robust security measures instill confidence in discussing sensitive organizational matters. This software ensures our data remains secure and shields us from potential breaches or eavesdropping, which is a substantial advantage.
It operates smoothly even on low-end laptops, eliminating the need for additional software installations. The seamless integration with Microsoft Outlook further enhances its user-friendly experience.
It's relatively basic in terms of functionality.
The standout feature of cloud storage for recorded conferences adds significant value, enhancing the overall utility and efficiency of the platform. For users considering Zoom, it's crucial to evaluate the size of the groups involved in video conferences. Understanding the performance limitations with a larger number of participants can help in making an informed decision.
Zoom excels in providing a tool for conducting dynamic and high-definition videoconferences with excellent audio quality.
Zoom does have a limitation when it comes to larger groups, and when more than 90 people connect, performance tends to slow down significantly. Issues such as audio or video pausing and, at times, losing the entire video conference can occur, impacting the overall effectiveness of the platform.
It is the best tool to conduct online meetings. The price is really very reasonable. It works best when you are not overloaded with the meetings.
We do have some issues. It lacks important features like sharing. Moreover, it is not easy to use software.
Highfive assists us to link with many remote staff and offers face to face communication and screen sharing ability. It is simple to begin feeling detached from one another seeing that our department is divided across to offices one on each coast. This software is used to aid close the gap offering us the capability to effortlessly have a combined team meeting between the two offices in our respective conference halls. Its use of screen of sharing aids us in managing to offer a simple method to fast go via PowerPoint presentations or show the team how to achieve a certain workflow.
Excellent for linking with remote staff and offering face to face conversations and screen sharing ability, ideal for corporations with numerous offices, or staff out in the field, it’s helpful even if you don’t have remote reps, the software’s sharing capabilities offer a simple method to fast walk via PowerPoint presentations or even illustrate to the team how to attain a certain workflow, and its suitable for duping your staff when they least anticipate it.
The software occasionally lags or functions slowly if you or a participant of yours in the meeting has slow internet and you can be duped by you fellow staff.
Its robust security measures instill confidence in discussing sensitive organizational matters. This software ensures our data remains secure and shields us from potential breaches or eavesdropping, which is a substantial advantage.
It operates smoothly even on low-end laptops, eliminating the need for additional software installations. The seamless integration with Microsoft Outlook further enhances its user-friendly experience.
It's relatively basic in terms of functionality.
It is the best tool to conduct online meetings. The price is really very reasonable. It works best when you are not overloaded with the meetings.
We do have some issues. It lacks important features like sharing. Moreover, it is not easy to use software.
The standout feature of cloud storage for recorded conferences adds significant value, enhancing the overall utility and efficiency of the platform. For users considering Zoom, it's crucial to evaluate the size of the groups involved in video conferences. Understanding the performance limitations with a larger number of participants can help in making an informed decision.
Zoom excels in providing a tool for conducting dynamic and high-definition videoconferences with excellent audio quality.
Zoom does have a limitation when it comes to larger groups, and when more than 90 people connect, performance tends to slow down significantly. Issues such as audio or video pausing and, at times, losing the entire video conference can occur, impacting the overall effectiveness of the platform.
Highfive assists us to link with many remote staff and offers face to face communication and screen sharing ability. It is simple to begin feeling detached from one another seeing that our department is divided across to offices one on each coast. This software is used to aid close the gap offering us the capability to effortlessly have a combined team meeting between the two offices in our respective conference halls. Its use of screen of sharing aids us in managing to offer a simple method to fast go via PowerPoint presentations or show the team how to achieve a certain workflow.
Excellent for linking with remote staff and offering face to face conversations and screen sharing ability, ideal for corporations with numerous offices, or staff out in the field, it’s helpful even if you don’t have remote reps, the software’s sharing capabilities offer a simple method to fast walk via PowerPoint presentations or even illustrate to the team how to attain a certain workflow, and its suitable for duping your staff when they least anticipate it.
The software occasionally lags or functions slowly if you or a participant of yours in the meeting has slow internet and you can be duped by you fellow staff.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Arkadin vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, HighFive Video Conferencing has 26 user reviews and Arkadin has 13. The average star rating for HighFive Video Conferencing is 4.61 while Arkadin has an average rating of 4.30. HighFive Video Conferencing has more positive reviews than Arkadin. Comparing Arkadin vs. HighFive Video Conferencing reviews, HighFive Video Conferencing has stronger overall reviews.
Arkadin vs. HighFive Video Conferencing both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Document Management, Customizable Items, Event Management, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Features, Third-Party Integrations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Arkadin vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, Arkadin offers more of the most popular features and tools than HighFive Video Conferencing.
In our pricing comparison of Arkadin vs. HighFive Video Conferencing, HighFive Video Conferencing's pricing starts at $15/month and is more affordable compared to HighFive Video Conferencing's starting cost of $15/month.
Our comparison of Arkadin vs. HighFive Video Conferencing shows that HighFive Video Conferencing scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin. Arkadin scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, but HighFive Video Conferencing has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
