In our comparison of Arcoro vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Eliminates stacks of paper applications in our offices by providing the option to gather applications online. Additionally, the electronic onboarding process has further eliminated the need for physical paperwork, which saves time and resources. Overall, the product has significantly benefited our organization by streamlining our application and onboarding processes.
It's great having an account representative who assists me in navigating the product. Additionally, I find it beneficial to have both onboarding and applications available on one site, which simplifies the process for me.
An aspect that I find limiting is the inability to make changes to the application myself.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
Avoid Arcoro ATS at all costs. It's an inadequately thought-out, unstable system that can't expand with your company. Even after months, the dreadful customer service was unable to address important problems. Look elsewhere for a reasonably priced ATS solution to spare yourself the frustration.
Affordable
Poor scalability, terrible customer service, product issues that were not fixed and overpriced data migration service
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Eliminates stacks of paper applications in our offices by providing the option to gather applications online. Additionally, the electronic onboarding process has further eliminated the need for physical paperwork, which saves time and resources. Overall, the product has significantly benefited our organization by streamlining our application and onboarding processes.
It's great having an account representative who assists me in navigating the product. Additionally, I find it beneficial to have both onboarding and applications available on one site, which simplifies the process for me.
An aspect that I find limiting is the inability to make changes to the application myself.
Avoid Arcoro ATS at all costs. It's an inadequately thought-out, unstable system that can't expand with your company. Even after months, the dreadful customer service was unable to address important problems. Look elsewhere for a reasonably priced ATS solution to spare yourself the frustration.
Affordable
Poor scalability, terrible customer service, product issues that were not fixed and overpriced data migration service
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Arcoro vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA has 98 user reviews and Arcoro has 6. The average star rating for SAP S/4HANA is 4.27 while Arcoro has an average rating of 2.33. SAP S/4HANA has more positive reviews than Arcoro. Comparing Arcoro vs. SAP S/4HANA reviews, SAP S/4HANA has stronger overall reviews.
Arcoro vs. SAP S/4HANA both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Accounting Features, Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Features, Lead Management, Campaign Management, Campaign Types, Human Resources (HR) Features, Event Management, Reporting & Analytics, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Collaboration Tools, Workforce Optimization, Payroll Features, Asset Management, Shipping & Logistics, Expense Management, Project Management Features, Resource Management, Document Management, Conferencing Capabilities, Portal Types, Workflow Automation, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies, Chat/IM Management. In our feature comparison of Arcoro vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA offers more of the most popular features and tools than Arcoro.
In our pricing comparison of Arcoro vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to SAP S/4HANA's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Arcoro vs. SAP S/4HANA shows that SAP S/4HANA scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support. Arcoro scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but SAP S/4HANA has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
