In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Concrete5, Concrete5 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Concrete5, Concrete5 has 14 user reviews and Alfresco has 13. The average star rating for Concrete5 is 4.64 while Alfresco has an average rating of 4.38. Concrete5 has more positive reviews than Alfresco. Comparing Alfresco vs. Concrete5 reviews, Concrete5 has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Concrete5 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, Document Management, Supported Content Types, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Concrete5, Concrete5 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Alfresco.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Concrete5, Concrete5's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Concrete5's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Concrete5 shows that Concrete5 scores higher in usability for steup & support, quality of support. Alfresco scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin, but Concrete5 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.