In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Canto, Canto is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Canto, Alfresco has 13 user reviews and Canto has 16. The average star rating for Alfresco is 4.38 while Canto has an average rating of 4.12. Alfresco has more positive reviews than Canto. Comparing Alfresco vs. Canto reviews, Alfresco has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Canto both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, Document Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Canto, Canto offers more of the most popular features and tools than Alfresco.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Canto, Canto's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Canto's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Canto shows that Canto scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Alfresco scores higher in learning curve, but Canto has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
