In our comparison of AdvancedMD vs. Epic, Epic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The client service is exceptional
Capturing all visits is possible, prompt payment.
The learning process for in house billing was tedious
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
This product is currently valueless. Don’t trust the sales team people but demand for a live trial instead and personally see the software’s abilities.
The help files are great but they could be updated.
Lack of an EHR, moving anything to a presentable format takes hours of tedious MS Word work, and the sales team is dishonest when advertising the software’s abilities.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
The client service is exceptional
Capturing all visits is possible, prompt payment.
The learning process for in house billing was tedious
This product is currently valueless. Don’t trust the sales team people but demand for a live trial instead and personally see the software’s abilities.
The help files are great but they could be updated.
Lack of an EHR, moving anything to a presentable format takes hours of tedious MS Word work, and the sales team is dishonest when advertising the software’s abilities.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of AdvancedMD vs. Epic, Epic has 75 user reviews and AdvancedMD has 105. The average star rating for Epic is 4.49 while AdvancedMD has an average rating of 3.66. Epic has more positive reviews than AdvancedMD. Comparing AdvancedMD vs. Epic reviews, Epic has stronger overall reviews.
AdvancedMD vs. Epic both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, Document Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of AdvancedMD vs. Epic, Epic offers more of the most popular features and tools than AdvancedMD.
In our pricing comparison of AdvancedMD vs. Epic, Epic's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Epic's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of AdvancedMD vs. Epic shows that Epic scores higher in usability for learning curve. AdvancedMD scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Epic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
