In our comparison of Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Provides quick and efficient data recovery solutions, including the ability to recover files at the version level, which is highly advantageous.
The platform is a fantastic tool that combines various functionalities to offer a complete disaster recovery solution, including essential cyber security tools.
As an MSP, it can be challenging to work with multiple portals to serve clients.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Provides quick and efficient data recovery solutions, including the ability to recover files at the version level, which is highly advantageous.
The platform is a fantastic tool that combines various functionalities to offer a complete disaster recovery solution, including essential cyber security tools.
As an MSP, it can be challenging to work with multiple portals to serve clients.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Provides quick and efficient data recovery solutions, including the ability to recover files at the version level, which is highly advantageous.
The platform is a fantastic tool that combines various functionalities to offer a complete disaster recovery solution, including essential cyber security tools.
As an MSP, it can be challenging to work with multiple portals to serve clients.
Provides quick and efficient data recovery solutions, including the ability to recover files at the version level, which is highly advantageous.
The platform is a fantastic tool that combines various functionalities to offer a complete disaster recovery solution, including essential cyber security tools.
As an MSP, it can be challenging to work with multiple portals to serve clients.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud has 2 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is 5 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud has stronger overall reviews.
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Device Management, Disaster Recovery, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud.
In our pricing comparison of Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs. QRadar SIEM shows that Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. QRadar SIEM scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, but Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
